In an editorial, the usually pro-royal Daily Mail accused Charles of a "campaign of meddling." 

 

"By lobbying ministers behind closed doors, the prince appears to be using his position to manipulate policy," the newspaper said.

 

Charles' office said on Monday that the prince had a duty "to bring his unique perspective" and experience into meetings with officials. (Now what is that? Ed)

 

It said the meetings were part of Charles' preparations for becoming monarch, and that he contributed "important insights, perspectives and knowledge built over 40 years of experience in a range of areas aimed at transforming lives and building sustainable communities."

 

'Particularly frank' letters

 

Britain's constitutional monarch has no political power, but meets regularly with prime ministers and other senior politicians to talk about events of the day. In contrast to her son, 87-year-old Queen Elizabeth II has not publicly expressed personal opinions.

 

This is not the first time concerns have been raised about Charles' political activities. The government and the High Court have blocked a years-long bid by the Guardian newspaper to force the disclosure of the prince's letters to government officials.

 

Attorney General Dominic Grieve said last year that the "particularly frank" letters reflect Charles' personal views and might give Britons the impression that their future monarch is not politically neutral.

 

END

 

It is a known fact that Prince Charles is a Free Mason and part of the Bilderberger. He is also a kingpin in the Illuminati. So this comes as no surprise.

Question: Why is the High Court blocking these letters? What's there to hide?